Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dru yoga
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar · · 16:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Dru yoga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:45, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: As it is a form of yoga, might it be better to merge it with another article somewhere? A quick search on google shows it as a valid form of yoga and there is a link to an academic paper on it. http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/waters.pdf' Inthepubliceye (talk) 16:05, 15 April 2013 (UTC)'[reply]
- Comment: There are a list of references in the article, and though most are unusable, some look to establish a little notability. Whether enough for an article in itself I'm not sure, though I don't know where else it would belong; there doesn't appear to be a list of yoga denominations anywhere. Also that paper is anything but academic, it's full of anecdotes and the author's opinion, hardly a reliable source. Samwalton9 (talk) 16:45, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 00:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 09:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.