Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Downward Dog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Userfied and informed the user. SarahStierch (talk) 02:04, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Downward Dog

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film has not entered main production, WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 16:45, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:22, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:22, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Main production added, cast & crew not announced completely by film makers. U BS 16:44, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A concern for those involved in expansion and improvement, Lacking information is not a reason to delete. We're here to build. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 00:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

And more results not found in Google searches: WP:INDAFD

Weak Keep and allow this new article to be expanded and improved using available sources. Tagging, not deletion is the more appropriate action for improvable topics. Okay with it being incubated while it is expanded with the title itself temporarily redirected to Azad Film Company until it is more suitable for mainspace. WP:WIP Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 00:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:16, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete or userfy - there isn't really enough coverage of this film yet to go crystal-balling an article. But I'd be fine with Schmidt's suggestion of userfication/incubation until it is ready. The author, though, shouldn't have replaced the content of Downward dog (the yoga pose that rightly redirected to Adho Mukha Svanasana) with content about the film and then moved it to Downward Dog. That's not a good idea. I have restored that redirect from the uncapitalised title and will disambig from this article. If this is redirected as a result of this discussion, there should be a disambig for "Downward Dog" at Azad Film Company. Stalwart111 07:56, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 02:03, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 03:05, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.