Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doubleclouder

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Transformers: Super-God Masterforce characters.  Sandstein  17:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doubleclouder

Doubleclouder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor character in the Transformers universe. No evidence of real-world notability. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 09:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You don't wikilink "real-world notability", and I don't find references to explain it when I search Wikipedia.  You've not made a policy-based argument.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:10, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Real-world notability" refers to "notability in the real world", as anyone fluent in English could probably tell you. That said, even if I hadn't made a policy-based argument, this would not be eligible for speedy keep, as ThePlatypusofDoom (plus others, now) supports deletion. Wikilawyering is bad enough, but wikilawyering when you're straightforwardly wrong is even worse. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:03, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete- per the usual procedure for articles on very minor fictional characters with dubious sourcing. Reyk YO! 11:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to List of Transformers: Super-God Masterforce characters or delete. I don't see coverage in independent reliable sources. Google Books results are just novels and self-published Wikipedia collections. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:38, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect as this is not importantly needed for deletion but it's also not convincing for independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.