Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorothy Newland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy Newland

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NARTIST. Theroadislong (talk) 08:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 08:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A run-of-the-mill painter. There is a tiny amount of coverage. This is a case where I think we should apply the more stringent WP:ARTIST criteria, as there is little that is really notable here.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article is actually not that bad after all the trimming. However, I think it's unlikely that it passes WP:GNG even if the two inaccessible sources could be read. Curiocurio (talk) 20:03, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it is not that bad but still marginal.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:32, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unfortunately, it does strike me as having been written by a friend or relative. Though there is some evidence she has a work owned by Edith Cowan University, I can't even find any proof that the Rotary Club of Pinjarra Art Award even exists. Evidently a successful artist, but not a notable one in the Wikipedia definition of the word. Sionk (talk) 22:54, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:15, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not meet WP:NARTIST ie. no wikisignificant exhibitions/critical attention, nor representation in wikinotable galleries or museums collections. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.