Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doorbin (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:44, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doorbin (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band with no coverage, despite having a few "blue linked" members (also of questionable notability.) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:21, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Review it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nayeem Hossain (talk • contribs) 14:23, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:25, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:25, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- The band has been covered by reliable sources as can be seen in the reference section. Band members not having blue link simply means that the band members are not notable as individuals it does not mean that the band is not notable. The band has won notable awards, has released albums, and have received coverage is third party reliable sources.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 19:10, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How do you figure that is significant coverage?

The first link is their own non-functional website

2 is an interview

3 is primarily an interview

is done by a freelance editor, the equivalent of an op-ed

makes no mention of the band

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:55, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - insufficient coverage to demonstrate notability. Being nominated for awards does not confer notability. Primefac (talk) 15:39, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.