Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doomworld

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 20:43, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doomworld

Doomworld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Grossly lacking in independent references to denote notability. All references are either to the site itself, or very passing mentions. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 21:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 21:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 21:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 21:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not contain any sources that are independent or non biased , seems to be non notable also.--JSon94 (talk) 22:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment note the existence of Doomworld (disambiguation) -- if this page is deleted, the dab page will become superfluous, so the closer of this AfD, if it is to delete, will need to take care of that page as well. -- 67.70.35.17 (talk) 05:40, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Along with Doomworld (Legends of Tomorrow), an unnecessary redirect which also would need to be deleted (and probably should be regardless)._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:55, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Many mentions, but all of them are insignificant._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:57, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Searches do not reveal significant, third-party coverage. Doomworld does not satisfy the general notability guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia. Malinaccier (talk) 06:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, and delete disambiguation page with it. Elliot321 (talk) 15:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.