Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donaldson Report

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:23, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Donaldson Report

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-published original theory of TWA Flight 800 crash. Will never be be attributable to reliable sources. Merge not necessary as TWA Flight 800 alternative theories page already covers theory's allegations in greater detail. LoveUxoxo (talk) 08:51, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replace with a dab page to allow links relating to carious document including Lord Donaldson's Reports~~, the Donaldson Enquiry into human embryology~~ as well as the present case. Rich Farmbrough, 10:49, 29 April 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- --Darkwind (talk) 12:57, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- --Darkwind (talk) 12:57, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

REdirect (without merger) to TWA Flight 800 alternative theories. Or make it a dabpage to deal with other Donaldson reports too, as User:Rich Farmbrough suggested. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:25, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.