Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don M. Winn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don M. Winn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable self-published author. Sourced with paid sources like Latin Times and reviews San Francisco Book Review. No genuine notability, like Publishers' Weekly review is also part of "BookLife" program. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR. Amon Stutzman (talk) 23:58, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Colorado. Shellwood (talk) 08:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the excellent analysis of the situation by the nominator.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Not notable. Masterhatch (talk) 02:14, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:18, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.