Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominic Colenso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. — Caknuck 17:24, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic Colenso

prod contested; this article is about an extremely non notable actor IMHO that is not sources and also orphaned for a long term. If this guy had even a shred of notability, more than one role would be listed and he would be linked to the movie/tv show/etc that he acted in. Postcard Cathy 01:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This actor starred in the Thunderbirds film (it says that in the second sentence), isn't that notable enough? He gets over 17,000 Google hits; the article has no sources, so add some sources. I don't see any reason for nomination here. Masaruemoto 01:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I never heard of Thunderbirds, he is listed far down in the list of actors on the IMDB cast, it was the only role listed, and most of the article focused on his non acting life. Sorry, the way the article reads and the fact I never heard of Thunderbirds to me meant non notable. But I will go along with what everyone else things. Since it is more notable than I realized, I now am neutral on the subject. Cathy

Keep but rewrite. Has had significant roles in notable works, as well as a sizable fan following. Groupthink 01:59, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletions. -- -- pb30<talk> 02:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The IMDb shows 6 rolls in the last 4 years, [1] including Prince Andrew in a 2005 made-for-TV movie. --Evb-wiki 02:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep and expand, all's he needs is sources. His IMDb page is rather telling of his notability! Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 02:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, I contested the prod, and this is why. Keep per above. Daniel 03:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. The article needs some work, but the subject is notable. Cquan ^{(after the beep...)} 07:14, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable, if not famous actor.
Keep/Expand In it's current state, the article is horrible. This just needs to be improved/expanded with more sources added. He is notable and article is deemed worthy for inclusion into wiki. --sumnjim ^{talk with me·changes} 14:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep per WP:SNOW. Rubbish article for a notable actor - the second line states he had a major part in a major movie. -Halo 15:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.