Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domingo Chavez

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ryanverse. And merge whatever may be appropriate from the history.  Sandstein  11:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Domingo Chavez

Domingo Chavez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fictional has no WP:RS reliable sources which WP:V its general notability per the WP:GNG. Thus this subject is an unsuitable topic for a standalone article. AadaamS (talk) 09:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Per WP:BKD in addition to Jack Ryan (character) as precedent. Has appeared in multiple books and films. While it's written from primarily a in-universe prespective, Deletion is not cleanup. I see that AadaamS has decided to pick on this and John Clark for deletion, two of the better written biographies in the Ryanverse as compared to Robby Jackson and Ed Kealty Hasteur (talk) 13:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 01:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. BKD, referenced above, explicitly says, While a book may be notable, it is not normally advisable to have a separate article on a character or thing from the book—if anything that should be a rationale for merge. But without a single secondary source in this article asserting the character's notability, there is nothing but plot detail to merge. I'm amenable to a merge target, if a good one exists, but there is no policy-backed rationale for keeping this article separate in any form. czar 16:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Merge to Ryanverse now that a suitable series article exists. The character's WP coverage should be proportional to its RS coverage. If the character is not used in several Clancy novels, redirect it to Rainbow Six (the book mentioned below) as a search term rather than to the series' character list. czar 11:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge/redirect to Ryanverse. Here is one source I found about the subject:

    Janssens, Ruud; Kroes, Rob (2004). Post-Cold War Europe, Post-Cold War America. Amsterdam: VU University Press. p. 150–152. ISBN 905383916X. Retrieved 2016-04-08.

    The book notes:

    In Rainbow Six, one of Clancy's main characters, Domingo Chavez, contemplates while his wife is giving birth:

    That was the key to the whole thing for Domingo. To be a father! To have a child, to begin the greatest of all adventures, raising a new life, doing the best you could, making some mistakes, but learning from all of them, and ultimately presenting to society a new, responsible citizen to carry on. That, he was...

    ...

    Ryan, John Kelly, and Domingo Chavez are completely good, except for one or two flaws—maybe to make them seem more human.

    ...

    Another indication of Clancy's one-dimensional characters and his limited imagination in this aspect is that Domingo Chavez like Jack Ryan is married to a physician.

    Cunard (talk) 06:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.