Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domain Validation (email)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. These articles should both have been deleted via G11 without going through AfD. I see no reason to extend this issue. Black Kite (talk) 22:46, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Domain Validation (email)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested proposed deletion. Reasoning was as follows: Does not appear to be a notable subject, no significant coverage from independent reliable sources is evident, possible conflict of interest issues as well. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:28, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bundling in 3-D Windows for the same reasons. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Theuser who created this has now made it clear that they are in fact the patent holder [1] for these two bits of technology, and has chosen to hurl nonsensical insults at me rather than participating in this discussion. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:34, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails notablilty KoshVorlon Rassekali ternii i mlechnye puti 16:35, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete appears to be promotion of user's product/patent --Elmidae (talk) 16:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both Obvious promotion of the author's own work with no apparent standalone notability. Patents are very rarely notable. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:06, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both, per WP:NOTPROMOTION and WP:COI violations. Slapping away Liz' olive branch and the personal attacks on Beeblebrox make me think the articles' creator may be WP:NOTHERE. Miniapolis 22:14, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.