Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DnL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 7 Up#Cancelled. Consensus that there isn't sufficient sourcing and that the relevant content is already included elsewhere Nosebagbear (talk) 18:25, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DnL

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Outside of a few sentences, this page is already effectively merged into the 7 Up page. "dnL" just doesn't have enough notability to stand on its own. Jcmcc (Talk) 04:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given that this article is over 15 years old, more opportunity for feedback seems appropriate rather than a quick move to soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 05:25, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Useful to redirect to 7 Up#Cancelled, where it is listed, per WP:ATD-R. Agreed that on lacking standalone sourcing, though I saw some promising starts in Google Books. czar 16:52, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.