Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dj Kingston WezWez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dj Kingston WezWez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article hasn’t received enough significant coverage in RS hence falls short of WP:GNG Hidden Hills Editor (talk) 16:53, 23 December 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. All the RS in the BLP article seemed to have been uploaded as File PDFs but have been deleted as copyvios? Britishfinance (talk) 01:59, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 14:53, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 14:53, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 14:53, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: An autobiography by a subsequently blocked WP:SPA. The text describes a person going about their trade; if there is notability it would rest on the claim of "Best Radio DJ" awards, but (a) these lack verifiable citations and (b) there is no verified indication that these were intrinsically notable awards anyway. Looking more widely, there is a brief in-role quotation from the subject about something else ([1]) but I am seeing nothing better in the Ethiopia Observer or elsewhere. Happy to reconsider if someone finds evidence of notability but as things stand this is simply a vanity page on a man with a job. AllyD (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per AllyD. Pretty clear vanity page. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:31, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per the comments above. Its self-promotion, with large portions of unsourced personal information. Daiyusha (talk) 13:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.