Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/District FM

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

District FM

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

District FM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is cited only to its own press releases; a WP:BEFORE search finds only articles like this and this, none of which appear to be written by professional journalists and are all thinly-veiled press releases. Fails WP:GNG and the creator has ignored at least 4 warnings about COI/UPE. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page is not COI sir. it has been broadcasting since June 3rd, 2020 it but was a minor spelling. and the page has no motive to enter twice. I'm new to Wikipedia and deleting this post twice after creation felt so frustrating I didn't know about the talk pages. but now I want to become a contributor and would beg for two of my article to be released thanks. I am still searching for an article with notability and would improve the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Innocentuzoma (talk • contribs) 03:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If no reliable, independent sources exist for this station then it isn't notable. That would also explain why its previous incarnations were deleted. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@spiderone i also marked this article paid. can it be release from deletion. while i work to inprove it thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Innocentuzoma (talk • contribs) 10:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion will last for at least 7 days. That should be more than enough time to find sources. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:08, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the cogent arguments made in the nomination, not A7 or G11. Has WP:PAID been adhered to? ——Serial 11:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete per WP:A7 and WP:G11. I draftified this article due to Notability/Promo/COI issues previously. Additionally, the creator of the article had been warned about all of these issues before they, including a COI disclosure request from an admin and a follow-up request from myself and multiple advanced warnings, which they then tried to hide by blanking their talk page. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Internet radio services are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their own self-published websites offer technical verification that they exist — the notability test hinges on journalists analyzing its significance, not just on showing that it exists. But the footnotes here are the station's own website and its press releases, not real journalistic analysis of its importance. Bearcat (talk) 20:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/District_FM&oldid=1009456505"