Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disneyland/Walt Disney World Music Vacation

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 18:38, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disneyland/Walt Disney World Music Vacation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album with no reviews in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ALBUM. De728631 (talk) 19:19, 26 October 2013 (UTC) WP:NALBUM. De728631 (talk) 22:44, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete--fails WP:NALBUMS quite spectacularly, with no references except the liner notes. Jinkinson talk to me 21:43, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Only source is itself. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:08, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's a delete world after all - You know it's a bad sign when the only source given for the article is the subject itself. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:24, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.