Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney Channel Taiwan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Disney Channel (international). —Tom Morris (talk) 10:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disney Channel Taiwan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just like Disney Channel Hong Kong, lacks notability --TBrandley (talk) 23:05, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Big difference here; Hong Kong is a time zone feed, Taiwan is a completely different network designed for that market and is highlighted as one of Disney's localized feeds in Asia. WP:BEFORE was clearly not done here. Nate • (chatter) 18:58, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:20, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect most of the content is a long list of programs and movies, most of which are also shown in the main channel. Would be better as a couple of sentences in the main article and redirected there. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:00, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to Disney Channel (international) per Starblind. There's not enough content to justify a full-fledged article on its own and the current lede looks almost the right size to go in the Taiwan section of the international article instead. – NULL ‹talk›
‹edits› 04:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.