Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dio Zambrano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:51, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dio Zambrano

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP article with only bare URLs and primary sourcing as, well, sourcing. I dream of horses (T) @ 03:35, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY without unaffiliated sources. --Drm310 (talk) 04:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence of notability presented or found. AllyD (talk) 07:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Total vanity and self-promotion. MiracleMat (talk) 08:18, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete--When one goes to the article and in the first line it states "Very important music producer" one can only imagine what the rest of the article contains. This fails notability hands down.--Canyouhearmenow 11:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We should be willing to give the benefit of the doubt for non-English speakers because they might be notable in other parts of the world. However, the parallel article at es:Dio Zambrano was speedily deleted this morning, so I see no reason to keep this article. Green Giant (talk) 12:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' as no evidence of any notability –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:23, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.