Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ding Mao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Baseball Watcher 02:09, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ding Mao

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BLP1E and WP:BIO1E, and hence WP:N. Of two references used, one is from the "Chinese Human Rights Defenders" website, which fails WP:RS as it is not a WP:NPOV source. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 06:20, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No information beyond a name except from the CHRD advocacy website, where every student is a "student leader" and every detainee is "criminally detained". The reference from AsiaNews (a self-styled Catholic missionary website) is just a passing reference; name-dropping for a nobody. Quigley (talk) 06:37, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not notable enough. Mentioned with other names in some news sources and no background to the person whatsoever. Zlqq2144 (talk) 07:18, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep: Complies to WP:N, he was a leader in the 1989 pro-democracy movement, a co-founder of the unrecognized Social Democratic Party, and now he is arrested during the 2011 Chinese protests. Meanwhile there have been added more references complying to WP:RS, hence the article about this activist should stay. — Waikiki_lwt ^{Talk | contribs | email} 08:47, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Passes WP:N. This AfD is part of an attempt by certain editor(s) to remove material that is negative to the Communist Party of China. --Reference Desker (talk) 08:06, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reference Desker, you will continue to lose the trust of editors that meet you so long as you throw such slimy accusations at others. –HXL's Roundtable and Record 20:56, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources added after nomination, meets WP:GNG via CNN, NYDN sources. --joe decker ^{talk to me} 18:27, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to some appropriate article about recent events in China. Even in the sources now added, Ding Mao is only mentioned as a dissident who has been arrested, but there is nothing about him apart from that mention. This is not enough to support a biographical article per WP:BIO. The article can be restored if Ding Mao is covered by reliable secondary sources in some depth. Sandstein 07:30, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, definitely not a BLP1E as explained above. Also, whether a biased source is reliable depends on the kind of information it's sourcing. - filelake shoe 14:31, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, /ƒETCH COMMS / 17:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Current version of article refutes all the nominator's claims. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:49, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY - it is now well-sourced and proves some notability. Bearian (talk) 03:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - well sourced and clearly notable.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect at best per Sandstein's comment. –HXL's Roundtable and Record 20:56, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.