Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinakrushna Das

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW KEEP. (non-admin closure) Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 07:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dinakrushna Das (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Non-notable poet with no significant recognition or demonstrated notability in his line of work. Nearlyevil665 (talk) 02:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 02:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 02:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 02:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This poet has been the subject of an entire book published by Sahitya Akademi ([1]), a reference to which is currently included in the article itself and was there when this was nominated. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. One of several recent nominations (e.g. Buket Uzuner) by this new editor which show no evidence of even cursory attempts to find sources. Please slow down on the nominations and spend more time on WP:BEFORE. pburka (talk) 04:41, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the search phrase ""Dinakrushna Das" encyclopedia OR dictionary OR survey OR biographical OR history" turned up lots of good looking entries in Google books. he is obviously a thing. I would also suggest to the nominator that they slow down on their nominations, as they have only had an account for ten days and the AfD process is complex.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:11, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes notability. He has enough works to justify notability.Priyanjali singh (talk) 16:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.