Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Transformation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:08, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Transformation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete: Essay? Spam? Can be improved? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:07, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As a long-retired IT executive, I had never heard it, but the phrase is out there, with 311,000 GHITS, for example this article from the online journal of the Wharton School: http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=761 Jonathanwallace (talk) 13:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes we should have an article on the subject, but this is is not now suitable for Wikipedia, but an essay--and, looking at it, it seems to have been copied from another source, though I have not yet found it--quite possibly somewhere on the capigemini site, which sounds more likely than MIT. The question is whether we should rewrite or start over. DGG ( talk ) 03:45, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete. Certainly this is an essay, with sparse refs corroborating particular facts and figures, but no references to the concept itself. As it was noted, the term is indeed in wide circulation, but this article clearly does not fit wikipedia requirements. Lorem Ip (talk) 01:20, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.