Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digicell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Digicell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV - cannot find any WP:RELIABLESOURCES for this article. Paradox society 21:17, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Paradox society 21:17, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Paradox society 21:17, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Of the twosources, one doesn't even mention this company and the other just goes to the home page of a digital magazine. The content is just self-description type, probably because there are no sources. North8000 (talk) 02:28, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the references in the article aren't really references and I can find no coverage to support an article. -- Whpq (talk) 01:01, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No WP:SIGCOV to support the article. - The9Man ^(Talk) 06:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.