Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dianne Rockefeller
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Dianne Rockefeller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Big pile of issues, WP:AUTO; WP:N etc. Falcon8765 (talk) 21:32, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as autobiography. The only significant contributor is User:Rockefeller1 and this article is the only thing they have contributed. There are no sources, and I can't find any either. Jafeluv (talk) 21:55, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as spam. No independant sources, no indocation of notability. Edward321 (talk) 00:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 00:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Ugh, this looks like someone's CV.Bonfire of vanities (talk) 04:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a WP:BIO fail. I'd even have someone's back if they wanted to A7 this one. youngamerican (wtf?) 18:49, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ad/bio. JJL (talk) 16:37, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A7 might apply. But this is not a resume service. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.