Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dianne Necio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dianne Necio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

poorly sourced promo The Banner talk 21:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not sure that it's promo, but the individual still does not meet notability standards. Logicequalslogical (talk) 21:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - the article is sourced with unfamiliar-to-westerners news sources. The first and third ref establish notability and the second ref is a dead link. Certainly not the best article ever written, but there is no reason for its deletion.   Bfpage |leave a message  03:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Sufficient news coverage to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.