Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Winter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Winter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with only reference her own website. Rathfelder (talk) 23:47, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 23:47, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 23:47, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:50, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 00:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Articles like this sourced only to the subject's own website should not survive 12 hours, yet somehow this article has survived 12 years. This is a disgrace to Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:35, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and John Pack Lambert. I checked the interwikis to see if there are any sources there, but nope. They are also "sourced" solely to the website of the subject and myspace. And, in full agreement with JPL, I have no idea how articles with dreadful sourcing like this stay on Wikipedia for 12 and even more years. Update: It is because the German and the French article was created by the same COI editor who created the English version. The Italian version was created by someone else. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 07:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero RS supplied for this article. There are 4 non english articles for her, but as noted, most of these were created by one author, and none of them have RS in their respectice languages. Until some RS establishes notablility, I am voting delete. Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:39, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - article created by WP:SPA with no evidence of notability. Maybe the article creator might have some idea of where we can find sources but I'll have to agree with deletion unless evidence of notability comes forward Spiderone 18:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Tagged for sources for over eleven years.

–Cupper52^Discuss! 10:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.