Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Van Laar
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MuZemike 19:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Diana Van Laar
- Diana Van Laar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 16:36, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nope, nothing Shii (tock) 06:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, fails WP:PORNBIO, no indication that the subject would pass the GNG or any other specialized guideline. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.