Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond Pet Foods

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Diamond Pet Foods

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm nominating this at User:HiLo48's request. This company's only in the news for a few product recalls,[1][2] hardly enough for WP:NBUSINESS. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 12:33, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - spectacularly fails WP:CORP. ukexpat (talk) 13:48, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - since WP:oneevent candidate and lack of notability from other sources. Thanks ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 15:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Just repeating part of the reason for my request for this... Apart from the recall notices, it contains some very glowing language about the company, such as "...focused on providing the best nutrition for every pet, whether it was an expensive show animal or a child's free puppy or kitten." Sounds like marketing hype to me, and certainly not encyclopaedic. HiLo48 (talk) 08:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is simply spam pretending to be an article. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's a shortcut for that - WP:ADMASQ.--ukexpat (talk) 13:41, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-encyclopedic stuff. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 21:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.