Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dheeraj Jorwal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 12:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dheeraj Jorwal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion Raju Jangid (talk) 10:00, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He is noted Indian entrepreneur. I added reliable sources. If you feel something like promotion then we can remove that things. But The Article should not be deleted. Virenderthind2019 (talk) 10:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Must not be deleted If we find an article written in a promotional tone, we should correct it instead of deleting it. According to sources, he is noted. That is what matters. Main thing, now I have improved the article. Now there is nothing like promotion. Virenderthind2019 (talk) 12:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think he is not notable current time and only references are not enough for notability. --Raju Jangid (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If only references are not enough for notability So please tell me what things are enough for notability?

Virenderthind2019 (talk) 16:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Raju Jangid (talk) 10:00, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete promotion and give warning to creator of COI.Krishna's flute (talk) 01:57, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete even assuming everything is true, there's no allegation of notability for this run of the mill business person. Lots of people around the world are "noted" in newspapers, some of them actually famous, but without being notable. Bearian (talk) 20:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: A publicity operative whose company has no article, so cannot provide a redirect target. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from doing commissioned work for celebrities (e.g. The Hindu article) and the other sources are the kinds of puff-pieces inherent in the subject's field. I see nothing which establishes encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 08:29, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.