Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devpack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Devpack

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is non-notable article about dead-provided and dead-developed PaaS Product. The article has been "Notability" template noticed since 12/2016, for 6 years (6 years is very long on IT field). And also, even the link to homepage site is no incoming longer time (since 2016). The article is stub, awfully shorter, and only source is a reprinted press release, so this have to delete.

And addition, in 2/2017, it seems settled "Proposed deletion" template and Proposed deletion, but not found on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/~~. Haruka Sato (talk) 16:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the gnews hits are limited and not in depth. Fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 22:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete thanks for the find. It might be easier to make the case for the company KT DS, and merge this into that article. But it appears that one was deleted in 2017 due to being advertising. The company seems still around, but sources are often in Korean, so would be work. The service by itself is not notable. W Nowicki (talk) 14:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I checked the source with google translator and found that it's a self thoughts not any particular news. No new sources has been provided since 2016 and the 5th[1] one is a dead link... २ तकरपेप्सी _talk 22:12, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.