Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Development of Vietnam Endeavors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:32, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Development of Vietnam Endeavors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. gets passing mentions in gnews but it seems to only attracted attention of 2 American regional newspapers [1]. LibStar (talk) 00:04, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support—Agreed that it seems there's too little media coverage to warrant a full article, despite the organization having existed for ten years and seemingly having done some good work in Vietnam. As per link above, the primary source for this organization is the Toledo Blade, with several other local papers such as the Monroe Evening News (behind paywall) and Southgate News Herald picking up the story, giving little more than passing mention as part of pieces on individual Vietnam War vets who have done work with the org. I did find one other mention in the U.S. Congressional Record ([2]), but again, it's a passing mention as part of a tribute to one of the co-founders(?). Perhaps the info in this article could be integrated into a biographical article on the founder (pending evaluation of notability, of course)? --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 17:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.