Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derrimut Heath Primary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Derrimut Heath Primary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable primary school in Melbourne's west, unlikely to have reliable independent sources for anything more than its existence. Its existence is already noted in Hoppers Crossing article so I'd argue it does not need to be merged. Orderinchaos 03:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Orderinchaos 03:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom as Aquinascruft. Non-notable school. Thewinchester ^(talk) 03:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per nom. Chris 06:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nn school. Lankiveil 11:13, 4 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete - Not notable, only started in 1992 so no historic value. Zivko85 23:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. Google News Archives does have independent sources according to Google News Archive. [1] Capitalistroadster 03:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Hoppers Crossing, Victoria per WP:LOCAL. Capitalroadster's references are about school fees in Victoria (they mention several schools not just this one), technology in the (global) classroom, a gifted child, and the wedding of one of the teachers. Come back with signficiant coverage rather than trivial mentions. Garrie 04:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• UndecidedRedirect to Hoppers, current principal won "Primary Principal of the Year" (not sure of the scope of the award), but the short life of the school and the original principals name only returning one ghit makes me think it is until just recently an unremarkable school. Perhaps a redirect/merge to Hoppers with history retained is appropriate. John Vandenberg 04:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • CommentThat would be a reason for creating the article Julie Mason, not a reason for keeping this article. However, I would suggest becoming Primary Principal of the Year does not meet any of the criteria at WP:PROF (academics) nor does it seem to meet any of WP:BIO. But in winning it she may have recieved multiple independent press coverage.Garrie 23:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've written a one liner on Julie Mason in Hoppers Crossing, Victoria#Education; I cant find verification of Nal Manolakakis or the founding year (except this which isnt very strong). There is no usable content on this article so it can be replaced with a redirect. John Vandenberg 03:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - There is no Verifiable source stated in the article, and it doesnt appear to have been the topic of any third-party publication. [[User:Savin Me|Savin [[User talk:Savin Me|Me]]]] 05:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Standard non-notable primary school running a range of standard programs. In general, it is very difficult to find reliable sources for primary schools and this one is no different. -- Mattinbgn/ ^talk 05:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Butseriouslyfolks 05:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.