Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denver and the Mile High Orchestra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sources found ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 00:25, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Denver and the Mile High Orchestra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND. I can't find any WP:RSs to support notability Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:12, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I found coverage in reliable sources very easy to find, e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], plus a review in Jazz Times. --Michig (talk) 13:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:10, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ~~Gene93ks~~ Michig's sources seem to establish notability. --Cerebellum (talk) 22:46, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources provided; Cerebellum, are you sure you didn't mean User:Michig? ;) —Theopolisme (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quite so; sorry about that :) --Cerebellum (talk) 15:48, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.