Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deniz Akdeniz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shimeru 21:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deniz Akdeniz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ENT, has had 1 role on a TV series, and it is questionable whether being a participant in a games show counts as signficant other role. no real coverage in gnews either [1]. LibStar (talk) 05:06, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 5 episodes on one notable show, and 27 on another notable show, are both significant. After seeing your comments on [2] I'm certain you are going to go around nominating one entertainment article after another, based on your interpretations of that suggested guideline. Perhaps you could wait for more input from others, before doing any large scale deletion attempt. Dream Focus 05:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

more input from others in this AfD has been received below and noted so far majority supporting delete. thanks. LibStar (talk) 05:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Dream Focus 05:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you are obviously following me around, suggest you cease. LibStar (talk) 05:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

funny that Dream Focus, 2 votes below don't agree with your interpretation of the guideline. LibStar (talk) 03:51, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the AFD, not other editors. Dream Focus 06:23, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:KETTLE. LibStar (talk) 06:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. Just read my earlier comment. I should've placed that on your talk page, not here. Dream Focus 06:39, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant to AfD note - You both are not new, and I think you both known each other's predilections at AfD. Perhaps this recent wikihounding thread on Dream Focus's talk page could compel both of you to either seek some outside help or maybe abstain from AfD issues until that issue's concluded. I don't want any debate to spill over here, but just so there's context for everyone else, and some indication to you two that others have noticed this issue. Shadowjams (talk) 06:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad others have noticed if anything. LibStar (talk) 06:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Personal dispute above notwithstanding, I am unable to find significant coverage for this actor sufficient to found a meaningful encyclopedic article. Without such coverage, whether or not he passes WP:N, it is not possible to write a verifiable encyclopedic article on the topic. No prejudice against recreation, possibly after Tomorrow When The War Began is released and more coverage is (presumably) generated. - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Whether or not he passes WP:N is what is important, not whether you personally feel it will be a meaningful article. Proper sourcing is a fixable problem. See WP:ATD.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Acting on a series only designed to fill time between shows is not only superfluous, but it might as well be classified on the level of an actor on a regular 30-second ad (and in only a few select cases do we have commercial actors having articles here). Only two other actors from the series have articles because they have had established acting histories, while this individual has not. Also I will probably say the Disney Channel Games "role" is in high probability incorrect, as his version of the series aired only on Disney's Australia and New Zealand networks, and the Disney Channel Games has exclusively American and Canadian actors from their US channel's series and it does not show up on his IMDb page. Nate • (chatter) 00:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per DustFromWords and Nate. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No sources found to establish notability. Even if the article technically passes WP:ENT (which is tenuous, at best), it still fails WP:GNG and WP:N. SnottyWong ^squeal 23:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per SnottyWong, this article's claim to meet WP:ENT is unconvincing. Reyk _YO! 02:17, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to As the Bell Rings. Fails WP:ENT as he has not had significant roles in two productions. We'll likely be recreating this once Tomorrow, When the War Began (film) is released though. - BalthCat (talk) 00:09, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
weak delete or merge: fails notability guidelines and could not find sources. not appropriate for a stand alone article but seems like it could have a suitable merge or redirect target... Arskwad (talk) 03:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.