Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democratic Socialist Union of Davaar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 20:44, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic Socialist Union of Davaar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Micronation with no claim to notability. No found coverage by external sources. Generally fails WP:NN Westroopnerd (talk) 23:30, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Yet another non-notable "micronation." --Non-Dropframe _talk 23:44, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. --Non-Dropframe _talk 23:48, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. --Non-Dropframe _talk 23:48, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. --Non-Dropframe _talk 23:48, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. --Non-Dropframe _talk 23:48, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also, you can't have a republic without a public - and I wonder if the owner of the place knows about this... Peridon (talk) 13:59, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- This has the feeling of the surreal. I suspect the whole thing to be a fantasy of the owner of the island, ~~even assuming it actually exists, of which I am not sure~~. A coup d'état in a date with a population of two (or three) sounds like a marital dispute, unless it was a sale. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's real - the island, that is - except at low tide when it's a peninsula. Davaar Island. From where it is, it could well be part of the Duke of Argyll's estates, as it was in 1766. There's one holiday cottage, formerly a naval post. Peridon (talk) 18:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly not a complete hoax, but certainly a joke, and certainly NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 10:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to be a cute bit of creative writing, but not the sort of thing that belongs in an encyclopaedia. Drchriswilliams (talk) 21:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Blatant hoax. Mutt Lunker (talk) 22:07, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, blabant hoax. --Soman (talk) 01:50, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Such a pity it's a hoax! Pincrete (talk) 20:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have th delete imediatley this nonsense adverb-articel about a nonexisting thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Volkstod (talk • contribs) 17:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.