Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delores Chamblin (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 02:31, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delores Chamblin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She makes things that are sold in some gift shops, but does not rise to the level of meeting GNG. The article has previously been deleted under this name and under a similar name (Afd discussion on the latter here.) Kbabej (talk) 04:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 04:42, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Blatantly advertising..also she does not meet notability guidelines. Also, as noted, previously deleted. I seldom, if ever, vote delete, but this merits a delete for sure.Antonio The Airbus A380 Martin (como?) 05:18, 3 March, 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, doesn't pass WP:GNG. SailingInABathTub (talk) 12:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, although it hurts me to do so to the author of Bathroom Tissue Toppers to Crochet. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing notable, gift shop crochet items? No, not notable. Oaktree b (talk) 17:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, didn't pass WP:GNG.SunDawn (talk) 18:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete falls incredibly short of GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per others.--by Alcremie (talk) 14:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete In agreement with prior comments. Stuhunter83 (talk) 22:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.