Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delhi International School Dwarka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 00:48, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delhi International School Dwarka

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has no references to reliable sources, doesn't seem to be notable, and is filled with original research. In addition, it is literred with advertisements to the school's allegedly official YouTube channel. I did a Bing search, yet it doesn't seem to shed light on its notability. Gerald WL 10:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TNT. A stub could be created based on a few news sources that I found online, but this page would have to be completely redone. Bearian (talk) 22:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Promo spam. Article idoes not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL / (WP:ORGCRIT). Subject lacks WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV that address the subject directly and in-depth. There is basic, run of the mill, routine, normal, coverage. The article author has exactly one edit - creating this article and seems from the lead to be mainly interested in getting people to subscribe to a Youtube channel. // Timothy :: talk 08:39, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.