Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debbie Nathan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 00:12, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Debbie Nathan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was prodded twice by two different individuals. I am inclined to agree with their prods that the subject does not meet our standards of notability. —Ryulong (竜龙) 10:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as the first PRODer; notability issues, the author seems to have written the page herself, only primary sources...— Preceding unsigned comment added by Forgottenfaces (talk • contribs)
Keep. The article already mentions her winning 2 awards for her work. In addition, GNews[1] and GScholar[2][3][4] show that her work has been reviewed and referenced in publications such as the Toronto Star[5]; Christian Science Monitor[6]; Seattle Times[7]; National Public Radio [8]; Newsday[9]; CounterPunch (she "exposed and virtually stopped the so-called satanic cult child sex panic")[10]; The New York Times (Victor Navasky calls her book a "definitive study")[11]; etc., etc., etc. Notability is not in doubt here. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Half of those are passing mentions of her name. And most are reviews of her Sybil book.—Ryulong (竜龙) 09:20, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong KEEP per the sources uncovered by Arxiloxos. Very definitely notable as a writer. Qworty (talk) 06:48, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.