Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deauxmae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Saltily deleted.. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:32, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deauxmae

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially a repost of the four-times-deleted and now-salted article Deauxma; the spelling of the porn-name has been changed to evade the ban on recreation of the article. Doesn't quite qualify as a db-repost because the subject now has a single porn-award nomination, but still fails WP:PORNBIO and the GNG. No nontrivial reliable sourcing, as before. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:50, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 23:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 23:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt this title too. I agree with the nominator's reasoning and object to the attempt to bypass the salting. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:18, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The addition of a single nomination does not change failure to meet WP:PORNBIO, although I appreciated it being sourced. Man, there are a lot of people nominated! Is there anyone in the industry who was not nominated? Also agree with the recommendation to salt--whether this was an honest mistake or a cycnical attempt to dodge the existing salting, it should not be allowed to happen again. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 23:40, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt, per Cullen. Moogwrench (talk) 23:21, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.