Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeadZones.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DeadZones.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Only passing mentions in "sources", and they mention a different website than the name of the article anyway. Dennis Brown (talk) 00:12, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non notable website, the article's main contributor seems to be closely related to the subject (WP:OWN, so the article is filled with POV and OR statements, the user refrain from accepting any possibility of the deletion of the article and has contested PROD and CSD nominations before. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 01:59, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per Eduemoni. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazymonkey1123 (talk • contribs) 05:15, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant coverage as required by WP:ORG. --Muhandes (talk) 07:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.