Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dayakar "Day" Veerlapati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:10, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dayakar "Day" Veerlapati

Dayakar "Day" Veerlapati (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable “businessman” who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of him thus doesn’t satisfy GNG. A before search doesn’t turn up any cogent reliable sources, most hits were user generated sources. Most of the sources used in the article aren’t even related to the subject. Celestina007 (talk) 00:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• • • • Keep A lot more hyperlinks that direct the reader to other Wikipedia articles was added, as well as greater inclusion of sources throughout the article. Links to broad topics such as locations and universities are now included in the article as well. The current sources included in the article are crucial references to Dayakar's impact and influence in his community. A source from the Journal of Global Information Technology Management(a highly regarded academic journal) was also added to exemplify Dayakar Veerlapati's significance. Dayakar is worthy of a Wikipedia page because he has been written about in mainstream independent media outlets, including the St. Louis Post-Dispatch (the major daily newspaper in the 17th largest U.S. city), the St. Louis Business Journal, Ingraham's Business magazine (also an independent publication), Inc. magazine and the peer-reviewed academic publication Journal of Global Information Technology Management. [[User:Adhithi c[Adhithi c]] (talk) 15:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nomination. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:12, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. No significant coverage. -- Ab207 (talk) 14:55, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for lack of notability. The Journal of Global Information Technology Management mention is an interview and therefore non-independent (not a GNG source). The Post-Dispatch mention is in its entirety "Chesterfield-based information technology firm S2Tech is celebrating its 15th anniversary." It's trivial coverage and doesn't mention Veerlapati whatsoever. The bizjournals.com articles are less immediately objectionable but still resemble business churnalism. The Ingram's article is a "top 50" list that plainly does not constitute significant coverage for GNG purposes. A BEFORE search did not reveal compelling evidence for notability. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 07:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.