Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn at the Royal Star

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:07, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn at the Royal Star

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book. No evidence of in depth coverage in independent sources, or charting. PROD removed without significant improvement. Stuartyeates (talk) 11:29, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Classic bad novel article, all plot summary &c. No claim to any kind of notability, and can't see anything out there. If there was this should be easy to finf because the author name is not commonplace.TheLongTone (talk) 12:41, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find anything to show that this book ultimately passes notability guidelines. It exists and can be purchased, but existence and availability do not equal out to notability. As far as I can tell, this is like most self-published e-books in that it flew solidly under the radar- there aren't even really any WP:SPS (not that we could use them), which is fairly telling. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG google search brings up nothing usable. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:09, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.