Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davood Roostaei

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:30, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Davood Roostaei

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I find very little coverage of this artist, who doesn't therefore meet WP:GNG. I took a look at WP:NARTIST, which lets artists qualify if "The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique." Since the article says he invented a style called cryptorealism, I looked that up--and came up almost empty. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:51, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:07, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - no sources found that help it meet GNG —Мандичка^YO 😜 04:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. Notability unclear. Created by WP:SPA. NickCT (talk) 13:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.