Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Sustak
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 21:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
David Sustak
- David Sustak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I don't believe this "American sportsman" is notable enough to have an article about him on Wikipedia. The article is just a mini-c.v. with no sources. Damiens.rf 13:17, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No significant discussion in independent sources. Cirt (talk) 18:10, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Simply a list without prose (no sentences!). No references - book titles (at least I think they're books) without authors raise major red flag and must be discounted without further details about them. No apparent reliable sources supporting assertions stated or implied in the list. Regarding WP:ATHLETE: it doesn't apply if the sport isn't covered by reliable sources. B.Wind (talk) 05:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment May be notable. http://stun-ningsales.com/SportStore/blowguns/asba.htm is interesting. Needs content sourced in independent secondary sources. The possible books, who authored and published them? These possibly notable blowgun "sportsmen" should perhaps be added to blowgun if this is the only reason for their notability. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:59, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.