Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Miskin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:11, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

David Miskin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The current coverage is not substantially convincing for his own notability and there's nothing to suggest the Lighstone Group CCO has any inherited notability; my searches have found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 17:38, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As the number of titles that include "chief" and "officer" in them at companies continue to expand from what was once just CEO, to COO, CGO, CEnO, CCO, CAO and CJO (chief janitorial officer), there is no reason to start assuming all these people are notable. Even CEO's of companies that are notable are not universally default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:26, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 00:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is promotion from an editor who does nothing but promote. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.