Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Kalb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cub Cadet#Cub Cadet Trick Shot Challenge. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Kalb

Non-notable person. Even if this event would be notable, the subject of the article does not fulfil the requirements of WP:BIO as this is only one event. Crusio (talk) 22:05, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Very non-notable. De728631 (talk) 22:35, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, speedy was denied (see also article's talk page). As the creator seems intent on keeping this article, I decided that prodding was probably useless. --Crusio (talk) 22:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Perhaps this subject should be moved to article on LeBron James. Jeremiah (talk) 03:18, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I have fought for the article to not be deleted is, it was going to be deleted because of it not being notable, not for BIO requirements. I understand that it can not fulfill the requirements of BIO and it will be deleted; but my point for challenging its deletion was that users should not tag pages with speedy deletion when the page does meet requirements. I have moved the information of the David Kalb page to Cub Cadet and redirected David Kalb to the new section but an admin will still need to delete the talk page.--CPacker (talk) 03:31, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 02:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.