Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Heidt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G7. Article's creator and sole contributor blanked the page with an edit summary indicating agreement with deletion. Consensus is clearly to delete in any case. Mkativerata (talk) 08:12, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

David Heidt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After googling, the only thing approaching notability I can find for the subject of this article is that he once coached a debate team that won a championship. All the other sourcing I can find simply verifies employment. Based on this, I'm going to say this article lacks notability. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 01:19, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Nsk92 (talk) 14:17, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zilch to be found. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:50, 26 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Agree that there's no notability here and none to be found. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 00:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DON'T DELETE. Although he may not be known by many, within the policy debate community David Heidt is famous. Since there are many other policy debate articles, he should definitely have one of his own. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmccarty (talk • contribs) 05:21, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is your claim supported by sources? Xxanthippe (talk) 05:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.