Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Aiazzi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:59, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

David Aiazzi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local politician, total failure of WP:NPOL. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Geschichte (talk) 06:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NPOL....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Reno is not a global city for the purposes of securing the "inherent" notability of its city councillors, so the bar he would have to clear is that he could be reliably sourced as substantively a special case of significantly greater notability than most other city councillors. Simply being able to offer technical verification that he exists, via primary source content on the city's own self-published website and routine verification of election tallies, is not the ticket to notability for a city councillor in and of itself — but that's the only kind of sourcing being shown here at all. Bearcat (talk) 15:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reno is not even close to the level of size or importance to give council members notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.