Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Ackert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

David Ackert

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Jack of all trades, master of none. A list of bit parts in TV shows, and various other claims, none of them by themselves providing notability, and I don't see any cumulative passing of WP:GNG either. It's also a puff piece, of course, as is the subject's IMDB entry. Drmies (talk) 22:54, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 12:53, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 21:31, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No Consensus I feel he is notable enough for an article. But this is a poorly written article. I know him from his acting not his activist work. Boaxy (talk) 07:35, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:45, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not enough relevant sources. The list of performance roles almost swayed me, but then I noticed that they were chiefly one-time appearances. The citations aren't all that strong either. {_C A S U K I T E ^T} 00:01, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a notable actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Let's quickly dispense with the business development and science fiction writing. I can find no coverage in reliable sources on those aspects aside from the San Fernando Biz Jounal noted already in the article. He appears to have received the most notice as an actor. It is primarily on his role in Maryam (film). However, the reviews I've been able to access such as [1], [2], and [3] don't provide significant coverage about him. -- Whpq (talk) 16:50, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.