Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Hodges (activist)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:40, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Hodges (activist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dearth of sources establishing notability. Please do not confuse this person with the right wing activist. They are different people. That man from Nantucket (talk) 06:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA (talk) 11:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA (talk) 11:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Google news on name + Marijuanan gives 200+ results - [1] going back to 2010. Here's a number of more substantive ones (not a complete list): [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] Icewhiz (talk) 12:05, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:TOOSOON; the "news hits" do not establish notability; sources are required to provide coverage that discusses the subject directly and in detail; not PR driven passing mentions, as offered above. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:ADVERT, ADVERT for local marijuana seller/activist with insufficient sourcing despite the brief mentions in local news detailed above.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a local store operator with no strong claim to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.