Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Considine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 10:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Considine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This 2004 article has no reliable references. It was deleted by prod in 2013 and then shortly re-instated after a request to undo the deletion. SL93 (talk) 23:11, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Connecticut. SL93 (talk) 23:12, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The subject is not notable and the article makes no support for inclusion in Wikipedia. IrishOsita (talk) 03:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted as a PROD and restored as a contested PROD so Soft Delete is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: fails WP:GNG; no secondary sources found online. References in article are either dead or are primary/affiliated with the subject. Iseult ^Δx parlez moi 23:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Promotional article only - look at the external links. Sgerbic (talk) 00:38, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.