Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Alizadeth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:56, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Alizadeth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In no way notable. This article is the poster child for why the essay at WikiProjectPoker should be ignored. Winning $20,000 in a casino employees tournament 15 years ago does not make one notable per Wikipedia requirements. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 00:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 July 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:35, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 06:54, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no where even close to being notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:35, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.